🔗 Share this article

American government attorneys have asserted that a Libyan national individual voluntarily admitted to being involved in operations directed at American targets, encompassing the 1988 Pan Am Flight 103 bombing and an failed attempt to assassinate a American politician using a booby-trapped overcoat.

Confession Particulars

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is reported to have confessed his participation in the killing of 270 victims when Flight 103 was brought down over the Scotland's town of Lockerbie, during questioning in a Libyan prison in 2012.

Identified as the defendant, the elderly man has asserted that multiple disguised individuals compelled him to deliver the admission after intimidating him and his family.

His lawyers are attempting to prevent it from being utilized as evidence in his court case in DC in 2025.

Legal Dispute

In reply, legal counsel from the federal prosecutors have said they can prove in the courtroom that the statement was "voluntary, credible and truthful."

The existence of the defendant's claimed confession was first disclosed in 2020, when the United States declared it was charging him with constructing and preparing the bomb employed on the aircraft.

Defense Assertions

The family man is accused of being a ex- official in Libya's intelligence agency and has been in American detention since 2022.

He has entered innocent to the charges and is expected to face trial at the US court for the District of Columbia in April.

The defendant's lawyers are working to stop the trial from learning about the statement and have filed a petition asking for it to be withheld.

They contend it was secured under coercion following the uprising which toppled Colonel Gaddafi in 2011.

Alleged Coercion

They claim former members of the ruler's regime were being victimized with illegal murders, kidnappings and torture when Mas'ud was seized from his residence by armed persons the subsequent year.

He was transported to an informal prison facility where fellow detainees were allegedly beaten and mistreated and was by himself in a cramped space when multiple disguised men handed him a one sheet of documentation.

His lawyers said its scripted details commenced with an command that he was to confess to the Pan Am Flight 103 attack and another terror attack.

Significant Terrorist Events

Mas'ud claims he was instructed to learn what it stated about the occurrences and restate it when he was questioned by a different individual the following time.

Being concerned for his safety and that of his offspring, he stated he thought he had no option but to acquiesce.

In their answer to the defense's petition, lawyers from the US Department of Justice have declared the judge was being asked to withhold "extremely significant testimony" of the defendant's responsibility in "several significant extremist attacks directed at American people."

Prosecution Counterarguments

They assert Mas'ud's version of events is unconvincing and false, and assert that the details of the confession can be verified by credible separate evidence assembled over several decades.

The legal authorities state Mas'ud and other former officials of the former leader's intelligence agency were held in a hidden holding center run by a armed group when they were interviewed by an seasoned Libya's law enforcement official.

They contend that in the turmoil of the post-uprising time, the location was "the most secure place" for the suspect and the fellow agents, given the violence and opposition attitude widespread at the period.

Interrogation Details

Based to the law enforcement official who interviewed the defendant, the facility was "well run", the inmates were not confined and there were no signs of coercion or pressure.

The official has said that over two days, a confident and fit suspect described his role in the attacks of Flight 103.

The FBI has also stated he had confessed constructing a explosive which went off in a West Berlin nightclub in the mid-1980s, causing the deaths of multiple people, including several American servicemen, and harming many others.

Further Accusations

He is also alleged to have detailed his involvement in an conspiracy on the safety of an unidentified American Secretary of State at a official ceremony in Pakistan.

Mas'ud is alleged to have explained that a person accompanying the US official was wearing a explosive-laden coat.

It was the suspect's mission to trigger the explosive but he decided not to do so after learning that the man bearing the garment did not know he was on a deadly operation.

He chose "not to push the device" although his supervisor in the intelligence service being present at the period and questioning what was {going on|happening|occurring